esportsMLBB

Sony Explains Xperia 1 VIII AI Camera Assistant After Online Roasting

Oleh Aimirul|
Kongsi

Sony’s Xperia line has always carried one big expectation: the camera must be serious. So when Sony showed off the new AI Camera Assistant feature for the Xperia 1 VIII with comparison shots that looked worse than the originals, the internet did what the internet does best — roasted it hard.

The issue was simple. Sony shared side-by-side photos meant to show how the AI tool could improve images. Instead, the AI-suggested versions looked washed out, brighter in the wrong way, and generally less pleasing than the untouched shots. For a company with Sony’s camera reputation, that was a pretty awkward marketing moment.

The backlash got big enough that major tech names, including Carl Pei and Marques Brownlee, joined in with jokes. And honestly, it is not hard to see why. If your AI camera feature is supposed to help users take better photos, the promo images cannot look like someone accidentally dragged the exposure slider too far.

To Sony’s credit, the company did not quietly delete everything and pretend nothing happened. It responded on X with an explanation of what AI Camera Assistant is supposed to do, alongside a new batch of examples.

From the response, Sony appears to be positioning the feature less like a magic auto-enhance button and more like a suggestion system. The tool gives users multiple possible edits or shooting recommendations, and the idea is that users can choose what fits their taste.

That makes sense on paper. Photography is subjective, and not every edit needs to chase the same Instagram-ready look. Some people want punchier contrast, some prefer brighter skin tones, and some just want the photo to look closer to what they saw in real life.

The newer examples also look better than the original marketing set. They do not have the same harsh overexposed look, and they make the feature seem more reasonable. But the bigger question still remains: why were the first examples approved in the first place?

That is the part Malaysian and SEA buyers should pay attention to. In our region, flagship phones are expensive purchases, and people care a lot about camera reliability. Whether it is concert shots, cafe photos, travel content, cosplay events, or just late-night mamak group pics, the camera has to be consistent without requiring too much manual fixing.

Sony’s Xperia phones are not usually the mainstream default here compared with Samsung, Apple, Xiaomi, OPPO, or vivo. But among enthusiasts, Sony still has a certain aura because of its Alpha camera heritage and pro-style photography controls. That is exactly why this AI Camera Assistant drama feels more damaging than if it came from a random budget phone brand.

AI camera tools are becoming a major battleground now. Brands want to convince users that AI can help with composition, exposure, editing, and photo selection. But if the results look worse than a normal shot, people will immediately lose trust. In SEA, where buyers often compare phones heavily before spending RM3,000 to RM6,000 and above, that trust matters.

The good news for Sony is that this does not necessarily mean the Xperia 1 VIII camera is bad. The controversy is more about Sony’s marketing judgment and how it presented the AI feature. The bad news is that camera-first brands do not get much room for mistakes when showing camera samples.

For now, Sony has explained the tool and shown better examples. That helps a bit. But until reviewers and users test AI Camera Assistant properly in real-world conditions, especially tricky lighting and everyday social shots, the feature will carry this awkward first impression.

Sony wanted to show that its AI could make photos better. Instead, it accidentally reminded everyone that AI editing is only useful when the humans approving it also have good taste.

Source: Android Authority

Tag

sonyxperiaai camerasmartphones